Palace intrigues and warring narratives on the left.

 

Hillary Clinton en Casa de América. January 24, 2024. (Photo: Casa de América)

A war of narratives is playing out on the left, and for once it is not subtle.

On one side is Jill Biden, still defending her husband, still trying to shape the story of 2024 as one of loyalty, betrayal, pressure, and one catastrophic debate night that shocked even those closest to Joe Biden.

On the other side is Hillary Clinton, who has now said the quiet part out loud: Joe Biden made a terrible mistake by running again. Not merely a campaign mistake. Not merely a communications mistake. A mistake for himself, his legacy, and the country.

Those are not small words. And they land even harder because they come from Hillary Clinton, one of the least impulsive political figures in America. Clinton knows exactly what she is saying. She knows exactly how it will be heard. She is not simply criticizing Biden. She is directly indicting the decision-making structure around him.

Jill Biden’s version is deeply personal. Joe was still capable. Joe had earned the right to make his own decision. Joe was pushed out by people who panicked after one awful performance. In interviews surrounding her memoir, she has described the debate as frightening and even said she wondered if her husband was having a stroke. That framing matters because it turns the debate into an event, almost a medical mystery, rather than the public confirmation of a problem Democrats had privately feared for months.

Clinton’s version is more political and more damaging. She says Biden should have stepped aside in 2023, when Democrats would still have had time for a real primary. In her view, had Biden passed the torch then, the party could have tested governors, senators, the vice president, and anyone else who wanted the job. Instead, Democrats waited until after the debate disaster, then handed Kamala Harris a campaign already boxed in by time, money, loyalty, and the record of an unpopular administration.

That is the heart of the conflict.

Jill Biden is trying to protect the Biden family legacy. Hillary Clinton is trying to protect the Democratic Party’s post-Biden future. Those goals are no longer aligned.

The most revealing part of Clinton’s remarks was not that she thought Biden should have quit. Many Democrats now say that privately, and plenty say it publicly. The revealing part was her claim that people tried to tell him before the debate and were met with denial — not only from Biden, but from the people around him.

That is a much bigger accusation. It suggests Democrats did not stumble into the 2024 debacle. They saw the warning lights and kept driving.

This is also why Jill Biden’s book tour has reopened old wounds instead of healing them. Her defense may be emotionally understandable. She watched Joe Biden be humiliated on national television and then forced out by people who had once praised him as the savior of democracy. Of course she sees it through the lens of personal loyalty.

But voters are not married to Joe Biden. Neither is the Democratic Party.

For everyone else, the question is not whether Biden deserved compassion. He did. The question is whether Democrats told the truth when it mattered.

They didn’t.

If senior figures knew Biden was too weak to run but publicly insisted all was well, then the party’s credibility problem is not a messaging problem. It is a trust problem.

The DNC autopsy tried to talk around this. Clinton did not. She went straight at the central failure: Biden stayed in too long, and the people with influence failed to stop him soon enough.

That is why these dueling narratives are so revealing. Jill Biden’s story asks Democrats to remember Joe Biden’s service. Clinton’s story asks them to remember what his final campaign cost them.

Both can be true. Biden may have had real accomplishments. He may also have damaged his legacy by refusing to leave the stage when the moment called for it.

The left is now fighting over which version becomes history: the loyal family version, in which Joe Biden was pushed aside too cruelly, or the party survival version, in which he was not pushed aside soon enough.

Hillary Clinton just made clear which side she is on.

(Contributing writer, Brooke Bell)